Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

All articles submitted to the Humanity Journal of Innovation and Community Service (HJICS) will undergo initial review by the editorial staff. The manuscript will be checked for plagiarism using Plagiarism Checker software. Manuscripts with more than 25% plagiarism will be immediately rejected and returned to the author without further processing.

Articles that do not meet this journal's criteria may also be rejected without going through an external peer-review process. Meanwhile, articles that meet the journal's criteria and have the potential to be interesting to readers will be sent to reviewers to go through a double-masked review process. Reviewer comments and suggestions will then be sent to the author for revision and response.

Decisions recommended by reviewers will be evaluated at an editorial board meeting. After evaluation, the editor will send the final decision to the author. The right to determine appropriate reviewers rests entirely with the editor.